The SpaceX Question

--

SpaceX began trading on Nasdaq on June 12, 2026, after pricing at $135 a share and a valuation of $1.77 trillion — roughly 94 times its 2025 revenue of $18.7 billion. That multiple has no precedent in the public markets. It exceeds Nvidia, dwarfs every cloud infrastructure company, and makes the dot-com era look conservative. Analysts will spend months debating whether the number is rational. But the number is not the point. The point is that SpaceX could not have been built — not the rockets, not Starlink, not the reusable boosters, not the ambition to colonise Mars — by leaders who were anchored to what had been done before.

Most leaders operate in the realm of constraint. This is not a character flaw. It is an accumulation. Every role you have held, every budget cycle you have survived, every board presentation where you learned to moderate your language — all of it builds a thick sediment of what is realistic. Over time, realistic becomes a synonym for safe. Safe becomes the ceiling. And the ceiling, presented confidently enough, passes for strategy.

Carol Dweck called this the fixed mindset — the belief that ability and outcomes are essentially determined, that effort beyond a certain point is wasteful, that failure is evidence of limitation rather than information about direction. The fixed mindset is not something people announce. It shows up in how questions are framed: not “how do we get there” but “why we cannot.” It shows up in resource conversations, in the way stretch targets get quietly rebased in the second week of the quarter, in the institutional allergy to experiments that might not work. Every rupee spent on an experiment that fails is cheaper than a decade spent perfecting the wrong answer.

Consider what Dhirubhai Ambani did in the 1990s. India had no meaningful refining capacity of its own; the country imported finished petroleum products and had little appetite, official or otherwise, for an Indian private-sector player changing that. Dhirubhai conceived Jamnagar anyway — a greenfield refinery in a coastal district of Gujarat that was, at the time, barren salt flat. No precedent said it could be done at that scale by a private Indian company. He broke ground regardless. The refinery was completed in 36 months, became the largest in Asia at commissioning in 1999, and today processes 1.4 million barrels a day at a single site — the largest integrated refining complex in the world. The question Dhirubhai never asked was whether it was realistic. He asked what it would take.

Those who lead inside large organisations — and privately suspect that this kind of thinking belongs to founders and entrepreneurs, not to them — should consider ISRO. In 2013, India’s space agency announced it would put a spacecraft in Mars orbit. The budget was ₹450 crore, approximately $74 million. Hollywood spent more producing a film about space that same year. ISRO had no Silicon Valley culture, no founder mythology, no patient venture capital. It had scientists inside a government institution working with less than NASA spends on paperclip procurement. Mangalyaan reached Mars orbit on its first attempt in September 2014. The mission succeeded not in spite of the constraints but because the constraints forced a discipline of imagination that abundance rarely produces. When you cannot buy your way to a solution, you have to think your way there.

The leadership task, then, is not to be more optimistic. It is to build conditions in which the people around you can operate from possibility rather than constraint. Three things make that real.

Permission is not enough. Resources are the proof.

Telling people to “think big” while giving them neither time nor budget is a familiar pattern in large organisations. Experimentation requires slack. It requires someone senior enough to absorb the political cost when an experiment fails visibly. It requires that the finance function treat a failed experiment differently from a failed commitment — because they are not the same thing. One is evidence of learning; the other is evidence of execution failure. Organisations that cannot make that distinction will not have a culture of experimentation, regardless of what the values statement says.

Failure must be safe, not celebrated.

There is a version of “fail fast” that is essentially a slogan, deployed in leadership offsites and forgotten by Monday. What actually changes behaviour is seeing a specific person who took a real risk on something that did not work, and watching what happened to them next. Did their career survive? Did leadership speak about it with intellectual honesty or with careful distance? Psychological safety is not built by policy; it is built by precedent. The stories that travel fastest in any organisation are the ones about what happened when someone got it wrong.

The personal payoff is not a promotion.

Organisational frameworks tend to underweight this. When individuals learn to operate from possibility rather than constraint, the primary beneficiary is not the organisation. It is the person. The capacity to hold a bold intention without immediately qualifying it, to stay in discomfort long enough for something new to emerge, to treat a setback as data rather than verdict — these are not professional competencies. They are a different way of being. They follow you out of the company. They shape how you parent, how you age, whether you remain curious or become someone who has arrived at their opinions and stopped. Dweck’s insight was not really about business performance. It was about the quality of a life.

SpaceX at 94 times revenue. Jamnagar built on a salt flat in 36 months. Mars orbit on a $74 million budget. Three different sectors, three different contexts, one common thread: none of it started with a question about what was feasible. It started with a decision about what was worth attempting.

Most organisations will look at those numbers and be impressed. The more useful response is to ask what is sitting on your own salt flat, waiting for someone to break ground.

Trust us to get your leaders to be at their best!

Connect with us

Know your mentor